Marc Cardona PBA Stats Analysis: How His Performance Compares to Other Players

2025-11-22 11:00

When I first started diving into Marc Cardona's PBA statistics, I was immediately struck by how his journey mirrors the kind of dedication I've seen in other fields—like gaming or tech startups. You see, I’ve spent years analyzing sports data, but I’ve also been an avid gamer and collaborator on passion projects, much like the mindset Dillinger described in that recent Agent Daredevil launch. He talked about finding people with the same drive, and honestly, that’s what makes Cardona’s story so compelling. It’s not just about numbers; it’s about how a player’s background and team dynamics shape their performance. In this analysis, I’ll break down Cardona’s stats compared to other PBA players, drawing on my own experience crunching data and observing what separates good athletes from great ones.

Let’s start with the basics: Marc Cardona, over the last season, averaged around 14.2 points per game, which places him solidly in the mid-tier of PBA scorers. But here’s where it gets interesting—his field goal percentage hovers at about 48%, a figure that, while decent, doesn’t quite stack up against top performers like June Mar Fajardo, who consistently hits above 55%. Now, I’ve always believed that efficiency tells you more than raw points, and Cardona’s numbers highlight a pattern I’ve seen in players who rely heavily on volume shooting. For instance, his three-point shooting sits at roughly 32%, which is serviceable but not elite. Compare that to someone like Robert Bolick, who nails threes at a 38% clip, and you start to see the gap. What stands out to me, though, is Cardona’s rebounding—he pulls down about 5.8 rebounds per game, which is impressive for a guard-forward hybrid. It reminds me of how in gaming or any team effort, the unsung heroes often handle the gritty work that doesn’t always show up in highlight reels.

Diving deeper, I looked at his assists and turnovers, and this is where my analyst side kicks in. Cardona dishes out around 2.5 assists per game but coughs up nearly 2.2 turnovers, giving him an assist-to-turnover ratio of about 1.14. That’s not terrible, but it’s below the league average for players in similar roles, which tends to be closer to 1.5. From my perspective, this suggests he’s sometimes forced into plays rather than creating organically—a bit like how in collaborative projects, if the vision isn’t aligned, you end up with messy outcomes. I recall Dillinger’s emphasis on meshing with partners, and it makes me think Cardona might benefit from a more cohesive team strategy. On defense, his steals are modest at 0.9 per game, and while he’s not a liability, he’s not locking down opponents either. In contrast, players like Scottie Thompson average over 1.5 steals, showcasing the kind of two-way impact that defines elite PBA talent.

Now, let’s talk about how Cardona fits into the bigger picture. When I compare him to rising stars or veterans, his Player Efficiency Rating (PER) sits around 16.8, which is just above the league average of 15.0 but well behind leaders who push 20 or higher. This stat, in my view, encapsulates his role—he’s a reliable contributor, not a franchise player. But here’s a personal take: I appreciate players like him because they often embody the grind that Dillinger mentioned. They’re the ones putting in the work behind the scenes, and in Cardona’s case, his durability is a plus—he’s played in over 85% of his team’s games in the last two seasons, averaging 28 minutes per outing. That consistency matters, much like how in gaming, you need teammates who show up every day. However, his free-throw percentage, at 75%, could use improvement; it’s a small detail, but in close games, those points add up.

Wrapping this up, I’d say Marc Cardona is a solid, if unspectacular, PBA player whose stats reflect a journeyman’s career. He doesn’t dominate in any single category, but he brings a balanced skillset that many teams would value. From my experience, both in sports analysis and collaborative ventures, it’s these kinds of players who often form the backbone of successful squads—they might not grab headlines, but they’re essential. If he can boost his efficiency and reduce turnovers, I believe he could elevate into a more impactful role. Ultimately, just as Dillinger found synergy with like-minded partners, Cardona’s future might hinge on finding the right team fit to unlock his full potential.